(03-17-2021, 03:21 PM)Karlo Wrote: What I figured out, is make the table with allowed notes 1 step in length, and set to play once (like XORAdmin mentioned in my "make next note random" thread). Then just put that table on every step that has a note you want quantized. This worked but took me forever to figure out last night.
So yes, I eventually managed to get it to work, but it wasn't well documented any where on how to make it work for a simple application. That's why the manual isn't very good. I want to sequence, not experiment for 6 hours listening to the same pattern over and over again trying to figure out how to quantize the pitch to C maj. LOL.
I agree in so far as I think the manual lacks a couple of simple "snippets" as in "When you want to do this, then do it like that" type of examples. Really the basic stuff. That would flatten the learning curv.
(03-17-2021, 03:21 PM)Karlo Wrote: Also, please please please, put all the expanders info in a separate manual or an addendum at the end. It's painful scrolling through pages and pages of information for something that is an elective add-on to the NerdSEQ and not relevant to it's core functionality. Put it at the end of the manual. Please.
That's probably a matter of personal preference. I like it the way it is.
(03-17-2021, 03:21 PM)Karlo Wrote: The envelops - All my modular envelops are digital so I'm not sure your comparison to analog envelopes is relevant. For comparison, I have an Intellijel Quadrax and/or IME Kermit mkIII (both digital and buttery smooth) and neither of them contaminate my signal like the NerdSEQ envelopes. I think what MGD said - it might be oscillating and making a short ringmod type sound to my output signal on the VCA - but I don't know why it would oscillate. I don't have the envelope set to cycle, it is set to one shot or once. I would argue Digital envelopes are superior to analog... just not the NerdSEQ envelops. Something you may want to look into.
On what data do you base your claim "Digital envelopes are superior to analog"?
Anyway, if you provide a simple project file showing the problem I'm happy to look into it on a scope.
Kind regards,
Michael
(03-17-2021, 03:33 PM)mvdirty Wrote:(03-17-2021, 03:21 PM)Karlo Wrote: The envelops - All my modular envelops are digital so I'm not sure your comparison to analog envelopes is relevant. For comparison, I have an Intellijel Quadrax and/or IME Kermit mkIII (both digital and buttery smooth) and neither of them contaminate my signal like the NerdSEQ envelopes. I think what MGD said - it might be oscillating and making a short ringmod type sound to my output signal on the VCA - but I don't know why it would oscillate. I don't have the envelope set to cycle, it is set to one shot or once. I would argue Digital envelopes are superior to analog... just not the NerdSEQ envelops. Something you may want to look into.
Could this perhaps be a 12 bit vs 16+ bit DAC thing?
I very much doubt that. 12bit is enough resolution for decent envelopes.