i think the problem is that it doesnt really record changings of the gate cv input.
would it be possible to have a gate column instead of a trigger/retrigger (move retrigger to fx)?
you could make the gate cover 1 or a view steps and infinity at FF and still utilize [] as noteoff (and maybe even another gate value on the noteoff step to add some there) for longer. a note thats played for 2and a half steps with gate resolving 1 step or less would look like that
c2,FF
-,-
[],77
and you'd have a higher gate resolution then
Edit: or even abandon the noteoff [] completely
Anothr Edit: to me it'd feel best if gate was completely independent from note so it could be utilised for an unrelated gating task while note is used like a mod output.
would it be possible to have a gate column instead of a trigger/retrigger (move retrigger to fx)?
you could make the gate cover 1 or a view steps and infinity at FF and still utilize [] as noteoff (and maybe even another gate value on the noteoff step to add some there) for longer. a note thats played for 2and a half steps with gate resolving 1 step or less would look like that
c2,FF
-,-
[],77
and you'd have a higher gate resolution then
Edit: or even abandon the noteoff [] completely
Anothr Edit: to me it'd feel best if gate was completely independent from note so it could be utilised for an unrelated gating task while note is used like a mod output.