07-06-2019, 11:28 AM
(05-17-2019, 06:42 AM)XORadmin Wrote: Discussed before and i am not planning to do this at the moment. Most probably because the sample tracks differ quite a lot to the other tracks as they are 2 tracks in one. It would need much work and compared to many other features/requests it has a low priority.
(07-05-2019, 08:42 PM)XORadmin Wrote:(07-05-2019, 07:48 PM)MikkoM Wrote: As a professional SW Architect (22 years of experience in embedded systems and cloud computing) I really wonder what kind os mess the codebase is if this kind of basic feature is hard to implement. Hardcoded track types based on what number the channel is.... nope.. you absolutely do not do it that way.
Hey Mikko,
what can i say. Tell me more, what can i do to make it better? How should i do it then?
I'm always open for constructive critic and good ideas.
Cheers! T
Quite impossible to say what the problem is without seeing code.
I assume it is pure C (?) however it is still possible to use object oriented programming paradigms to make code modular, reusable and extensible.
It is also quite important to remember that refactoring code IS "business as usual" and should not be feared.
Anyway, Nerdseq is really impressive accomplishment by one guy, so sorry if my first message sounded little bit harsh
