03-01-2021, 09:57 AM
As I have understood it, the problem jlamores is trying to solve involves (re)synching tracks with patterns of different lengths. Stopping the track was just an attempt to work around the "problem" that STSP does not immediately start the next pattern but waits for the currently playing to end.
Here is a simplified example. Let's assume the following sequencer screen:
00 01
-- 02
03 04
Pattern 00 be 8 steps long, pattern 01 and 02 each 7 steps, all the same clock. However pattern 03 and 04 shall start concurrently regardless of pattern 00 being in the middle or at the end of its loop. Putting a STSP 002 at the end of pattern 02 does start 03 and 04, but not concurrently because 03 waits for pattern 00 to finish its current loop (which in this example is 2 clocks after 02 has ended).
I have not tried this because I'm in the middle of restructuring my case and don't have it working yet, but that's how I understood the problem as of jlamores second post in this thread (see above).
Is it possible to have 03 and 04 start concurrently and how?
Kind regards,
Michael
Here is a simplified example. Let's assume the following sequencer screen:
00 01
-- 02
03 04
Pattern 00 be 8 steps long, pattern 01 and 02 each 7 steps, all the same clock. However pattern 03 and 04 shall start concurrently regardless of pattern 00 being in the middle or at the end of its loop. Putting a STSP 002 at the end of pattern 02 does start 03 and 04, but not concurrently because 03 waits for pattern 00 to finish its current loop (which in this example is 2 clocks after 02 has ended).
I have not tried this because I'm in the middle of restructuring my case and don't have it working yet, but that's how I understood the problem as of jlamores second post in this thread (see above).
Is it possible to have 03 and 04 start concurrently and how?
Kind regards,
Michael