Posts: 3.710
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
216
(06-04-2018, 01:26 AM)matsmile Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:16 AM)XORadmin Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:10 AM)matsmile Wrote: Can I route those LFOs outside via the MOD output?
Of course, you can route all automators to the outputs as well of course. In your case just use the MOD as destination in the modulation matrix (function 01 in the tracks 1..6)...and even better you can route multiple LFO to one output for example and much more.... What will happened to the existing MOD values on this track
They work together. Play a melody on eg the CV output, put the LFO with a small range on it and you get a vibrated melody...and so on
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Posts: 3.710
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
216
(06-04-2018, 09:24 PM)holo Wrote: and there will be atenuator, offset, invert, glide and quantizer for cv input?
Yes, there will be a bunch of settings like with the LFO's as example to manipulate the incoming CV signals.
Don't know about the glide though yet as i didn't think about it. But the rest was already planned.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Posts: 135
Threads: 35
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation:
0
06-05-2018, 04:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018, 04:48 PM by holo.)
nice
logic operators that work with 2 inputs could be fun too
edit: and an envelope follower?
Posts: 3.710
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
216
(06-05-2018, 04:37 PM)holo Wrote: nice
logic operators that work with 2 inputs could be fun too
Ha, maybe something that can do everything ;-)
But that brings me to another cool idea for it
Cheers!
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Posts: 135
Threads: 35
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation:
0
thought i was addressing the man who can do everything..
.. with that envelope follower and a treshold you can compress the internal sample drums with the help of one multiple and a cable
Posts: 3.710
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
216
(06-05-2018, 05:09 PM)holo Wrote: thought i was addressing the man who can do everything..
.. with that envelope follower and a treshold you can compress the internal sample drums with the help of one multiple and a cable
Wrong address i guess
I'm in the continious state of resisting too many good ideas to implement directly...It's not that i don't want to add all that fancy stuff if possible. It's just that my ever growing 2do list is growing faster than my 'done'-list. Stay tuned, many cool things in the pipeline, but getting this relase done first before it has too many open ends.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Posts: 6
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
(06-05-2018, 07:30 AM)XORadmin Wrote: (06-04-2018, 01:26 AM)matsmile Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:16 AM)XORadmin Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:10 AM)matsmile Wrote: Can I route those LFOs outside via the MOD output?
Of course, you can route all automators to the outputs as well of course. In your case just use the MOD as destination in the modulation matrix (function 01 in the tracks 1..6)...and even better you can route multiple LFO to one output for example and much more.... What will happened to the existing MOD values on this track
They work together. Play a melody on eg the CV output, put the LFO with a small range on it and you get a vibrated melody...and so on I see, they just add up. Is there a way to make MOD values affect one of the parameters of the LFO instead of combining them?
Also, would it be feasible to activate automation only on certain steps of the sequence or only on certain patterns?
Posts: 3.710
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
216
(06-05-2018, 07:47 PM)matsmile Wrote: (06-05-2018, 07:30 AM)XORadmin Wrote: (06-04-2018, 01:26 AM)matsmile Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:16 AM)XORadmin Wrote: (06-03-2018, 09:10 AM)matsmile Wrote: Can I route those LFOs outside via the MOD output?
Of course, you can route all automators to the outputs as well of course. In your case just use the MOD as destination in the modulation matrix (function 01 in the tracks 1..6)...and even better you can route multiple LFO to one output for example and much more.... What will happened to the existing MOD values on this track
They work together. Play a melody on eg the CV output, put the LFO with a small range on it and you get a vibrated melody...and so on I see, they just add up. Is there a way to make MOD values affect one of the parameters of the LFO instead of combining them?
Also, would it be feasible to activate automation only on certain steps of the sequence or only on certain patterns?
All destinations are added up and depending on the destination, added up or overrule the current value.
There is no need to use the MOD values to change the LFO (or other automators). You can change all values from all automator slots in every FX column including starting and stopping which answers your 2nd question also already.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
06-05-2018, 10:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018, 10:47 PM by volante.)
Amazing sequencer and what a great update! Thank you very much!!
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation:
0
06-06-2018, 03:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2018, 03:49 PM by volante.)
I think its good that you focus on the next release and not on getting too many fancy things on board before everything is stable (in my opinion). Its a really good and powerful sequencer and its soooo capable already. <3 <3 <3
I have found some minor things to report (not actual bugs but...anyway):
1. The instant mute/unmute and solo/unsolo commands are excellent and very important for live use, but I think they are much too sensitive. At least for me its hard to rely safely on them when trying to solo a track with one hand (ex SHIFT+START+UP). Maybe a solution could be to find an only-two-button combination (yes, when muting Im holding shift and THEN pushing START etc...).
2. Its possible place and write patterns under sequencer-mode while playing and thats great. But its not possible to delete patterns while playing which might be a good thing sometimes.
3. If you happens to put an empty table outside of an note, then next table (creating an arpeggio for example) won't execute in time if its loop is set to "endless". The solution is to set the empty table (I mean filled with zeros 00 00 00...) right on the actual note before, or to put an arpeggio table on the step before the note you want arpeggio on.
the LFO-s and automation matrix are.... great!!
|