Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
table probability?
#1
hello, isn't it supposed that the table probability % sets the probability according to which the table will be used or not? because i cannot get it to work. i have set a table probability for example to 0004 and the table is used every time
Reply
#2
Works with me.
Are you sure you are using the PRTB command?
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!  Smile
Reply
#3
yes. i have a note and table 00 and PRTB004. two steps later i set the table to ** with a PRTB064.

when i set the PRTB value one step earlier it works (same for the fx probability). is this like it is supposed to be
Reply
#4
Oh i see, you are right!! I was just testing the probability generally. But it has to do with the order as it seems.

I just checked the code:
Processing order:
Table
Patch
FX
All the rest

I will change it to this:
Patch
FX
Table
All the rest

Patch has a higher order then FX so values can be overruled by FX. So with that the probability of patches would always be starting from the next step. Classical chicken and egg problem. :-)
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!  Smile
Reply
#5
hm, i came along this strange behaviour now:
on step i set the table to ** with a probability of 064
somewhere in the middle i set the table to 01 with a probability of 044

now, when the table is in use the first step is still using table 01, even so it is set to ** on that step

edit: seems the table ** generally has a one step delay to take place
edit2: or it seems that the probability doesn't take place. i will try to find out what exactly causes it
Reply
#6
Did you install now the latest RC4? Because i fixed the table order in this.
PLEASE use the search function if something have been asked or discussed before.
Every (unnessesary) forum support means less time to develop! But of course, i am here to help!  Smile
Reply
#7
nope. sorry, i wasn't aware of the new version. seems to work like it should.

and to be honest, i guess it may also be a problem that some of the fx settings where in an unknown state at pattern change. this is something i have to learn and keep in mind
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)